<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Returning Subroutine Values in Python</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Returning+Subroutine+Values+in+Python</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>regex - Adding ?nocache=1 to every url (including the assets like ...</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38333569/adding-nocache-1-to-every-url-including-the-assets-like-stylesheet-behind-the</link><description>But what I would like to do is to apply ?nocache=1 to every URL related to the site (including the assets like style.css) so that I get the non cached version of the files.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:18:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is there a &lt;meta&gt; tag to turn off caching in all browsers?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1341089/is-there-a-meta-tag-to-turn-off-caching-in-all-browsers</link><description>I noticed some caching issues with service calls when repeating the same service call (long polling). Adding metadata didn't help. One solution is to pass a timestamp to ensure ie thinks it's a different http service request. That worked for me, so adding a server side scripting code snippet to automatically update this tag wouldn't hurt:</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 05:40:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why both no-cache and no-store should be used in HTTP response?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/866822/why-both-no-cache-and-no-store-should-be-used-in-http-response</link><description>no-store should not be necessary in normal situations, and in some cases can harm speed and usability. It was intended as a privacy measure: it tells browsers and caches that the response contains sensitive information that should never be written to a disk-based cache (or other non-volatile storage). How it works: Normally, even if a response is marked as no-cache by the server, a user agent ...</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:32:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Alpine Dockerfile advantages of --no-cache vs. rm /var/cache/apk/*</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49118579/alpine-dockerfile-advantages-of-no-cache-vs-rm-var-cache-apk</link><description>When creating Dockerfiles using an Alpine image, I have often seen the use of either apk add --no-cache, or apk add followed by an rm /var/cache/apk/* statement. I am curious to know whether maki...</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:14:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to make browser stop caching GWT nocache.js</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13074926/how-to-make-browser-stop-caching-gwt-nocache-js</link><description>However, if I open the app.nocache.js on the browser, the javascript is referring to 6E89D5C912DD8F3F806083C8AA626B83.cache.html!!! That is, even though the web server sent a new app.nocache.js, the browser seems to have ignored that and kept using its cached copy! Goto Google-&gt;GWT Compile in Eclipse. Recompile the whole thing.</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>c# - Prevent Caching in ASP.NET MVC for specific actions using an ...</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10011780/prevent-caching-in-asp-net-mvc-for-specific-actions-using-an-attribute</link><description>If your class or action didn't have NoCache when it was rendered in your browser and you want to check it's working, remember that after compiling the changes you need to do a "hard refresh" (Ctrl+F5) in your browser. Until you do so, your browser will keep the old cached version, and won't refresh it with a "normal refresh" (F5).</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 03:04:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How do we control web page caching, across all browsers?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49547/how-do-we-control-web-page-caching-across-all-browsers</link><description>Our investigations have shown us that not all browsers respect the HTTP cache directives in a uniform manner. For security reasons we do not want certain pages in our application to be cached, eve...</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 05:32:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Difference between Pragma and Cache-Control headers?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10314174/difference-between-pragma-and-cache-control-headers</link><description>Pragma is the HTTP/1.0 implementation and cache-control is the HTTP/1.1 implementation of the same concept. They both are meant to prevent the client from caching the response. Older clients may not support HTTP/1.1 which is why that header is still in use.</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:33:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is pip's `--no-cache-dir` good for? - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45594707/what-is-pips-no-cache-dir-good-for</link><description>From fastapi official doc The --no-cache-dir option tells pip to not save the downloaded packages locally, as that is only if pip was going to be run again to install the same packages, but that's not the case when working with containers. Basically, there is no need to store whatever package cache you're installing locally since it is not required by docker containers.</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:57:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sequence cache and performance - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24298868/sequence-cache-and-performance</link><description>If you omit both CACHE and NOCACHE, then the database caches 20 sequence numbers by default. Oracle recommends using the CACHE setting to enhance performance if you are using sequences in an Oracle Real Application Clusters environment. Using the CACHE and NOORDER options together results in the best performance for a sequence. CACHE option is used without the ORDER option, each instance ...</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>